Current:Home > ContactPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -CapitalCourse
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-08 05:08:55
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (4934)
Related
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- In Georgia, Kemp and Abrams underscore why governors matter
- Flying toilets! Sobering stats! Poo Guru's debut! Yes, it's time for World Toilet Day
- Depression And Alzheimer's Treatments At A Crossroads
- Average rate on 30
- Special counsel Jack Smith says he'll seek speedy trial for Trump in documents case
- Control of Congress matters. But which party now runs your state might matter more
- Play explicit music at work? That could amount to harassment, court rules
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Her miscarriage left her bleeding profusely. An Ohio ER sent her home to wait
Ranking
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Kroy Biermann Seeking Sole Legal and Physical Custody of His and Kim Zolciak's Kids Amid Divorce
- Enbridge Now Expects $55 Million Fine for Michigan Oil Spill
- As Amazon Fires Burn, Pope Convenes Meeting on the Rainforests and Moral Obligation to Protect Them
- 'Most Whopper
- Isle of Paradise Flash Deal: Save 56% on Mess-Free Self-Tanning Mousse
- Researchers Find No Shortcuts for Spotting Wells That Leak the Most Methane
- 'Running While Black' tells a new story about who belongs in the sport
Recommendation
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Chrissy Teigen Reacts to Speculation She Used a Surrogate to Welcome Baby Esti
Indiana doctor sues AG to block him from obtaining patient abortion records
Today’s Climate: Aug. 2, 2010
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
When she left Ukraine, an opera singer made room for a most precious possession
Real Housewives of Miami's Guerdy Abraira Shares Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Antarctica Ice Loss Tripled in 5 Years, and That’s Raising Sea Level Risks